of integrated AI pilots in the reported study extracted millions in value.
MIT NANDA, 2025, as reported by Virtualization Review ↗Governed AI agent workflows
The trust layer for enterprise AI agents.
Your teams want AI agents doing real work. Your security, risk and compliance teams keep saying no, and they’re right to. Taskflo is being built to give them a defensible way to say yes.
The four checks are Authorise, Comply, Execute and Attest. An action denied at any check stops and the decision is recorded.
01 / The gap
A working pilot isn’t a permission to deploy.
Cost. Reach. Accountability. Before an agent does real work, someone needs answers they can defend.
of agentic AI projects predicted to be cancelled by the end of 2027.
Gartner forecast, June 2025 ↗Inadequate risk controls is one of three reasons Gartner names for cancellations.
A forecast, not an observed failure rate ↗02 / The questions that matter
Three questions between an agent and production.
01Review the boundary02Inspect the four checks03See the evidence model
Where does our data go?
The runtime belongs in your cloud account.
Who can act on our behalf?
Only declared tools, within limits your teams set.
Can we prove what happened?
Every action needs a tamper-evident record.
Score any platform against these questions.
The AI Agent Approval Playbook ↗03 / How it works
Two halves. The split between them is the whole idea.
Design in Studio. Run in your cloud. The sealed bundle connects them, without handing over your runtime.
04 / Proof before it runs
The page your reviewer should see before go-live.
What it can spend. What it can reach. Which actions need a person. These are the bounds Taskflo is designed to calculate for each version.
How the bounds are calculated ↗Reference workflow
Invoice triage
Declared bounds · before go-live
- $2.50
- Maximum cost per runA declared ceiling, calculated from the workflow design.
- 3
- Reachable systemsThe systems this workflow is designed to contact.
- 1
- Irreversible actionNamed before promotion, with recovery requirements reviewed.
- 1
- Human approvalA separate approver for invoices above $500.
Reference workflow
Invoice triageStarts with Invoice received
- ExtractInvoice fields
- ValidateSchema & vendor
- Triage agentClassify exception
- CheckpointDurable state
- BranchAbove $500?
- ApproveSeparate approver
- Post to ERPDeclared action
Up to $500 Post directly to ERP after the checks.
Above $500 A separate person must approve before posting.
05 / Built for regulated teams
For the people whose job is to prove what happened.
Banking & financial services
KYC periodic review, and the workflows around it.
Explore banking ↗Insurance
First-notice-of-loss triage, and the workflows around it.
Explore insurance ↗See all industries
Illustrative workflow designs, not customer case studies.
06 / The regulatory context
The EU AI Act turns good practice into law.
Technical controls need to produce evidence. Your use case, role and transition provisions determine which obligations apply.
Today: October 2026. Prepare for the next applicable deadline.
- 2 August 2025General-purpose AI rules
- 2 August 2026Broad application, including transparency duties
- 2 December 2027Annex III high-risk obligations
- 2 August 2028High-risk AI integrated into Annex I regulated products
€35m / 7%Prohibited practices
€15m / 3%Provider, deployer and transparency obligations
€7.5m / 1%Incorrect information to authorities
Application depends on use, role and transitional provisions. Fine ceilings depend on the infringement and undertaking; special rules apply to SMEs. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 · AI Act, Article 99 · European Commission timeline.
One workflow. a clear next step.
Everyone is building agents. We’re building the reason a bank is allowed to run one.
Tell us about the process, the systems and the people. Let’s work through what it would take to run it.